Previous Post: Paddling Around Philip Edward Island – Part One
Day Three: From Big Rock Bay to Mill Lake (26 Km.)
The first thing we did after our late get-up (7:45!) was climb back up to the top of Big Rock for some morning shots of Georgian Bay to the north and west and of Big Rock Bay immediately below us. It was a beginning of a sunny day with next to no wind and the paddling would prove to be easy.
While we were up there we would see the only other paddlers of our four-day trip pass by below. They were headed west towards the Fox Archipelago.
Before leaving home I had gone though my copy of In The Footsteps of the Group of Seven by Jim and Sue Waddington to see if any of the sites they identified were in the area where we would be paddling. While I didn’t find any mention, it was still easy to imagine a Group of Seven painter sitting with paints and board up on top of Big Rock and taking in the scene. Jim Waddington would later confirm that the group never made it up to the Philip Edward Island area with this comment –
Although Tom Thomson and the group seem to have explored much of Georgian Bay, I haven’t found anything that they did between Killarney and the French River. (Thomson sketched at the mouth of the French and paddled up it.) They usually travelled by train and then canoe so they would not have had a convenient way to Philip Edward Island. Too bad. [See here for the source.]
Before leaving our campsite, we did get a shot of it and the Big Rock top where we had spent some quality time. In the pic below the campsite is on the middle right and Big Rock is on top left. Then it was time to move on.
Given the tranquil water we found ourselves paddling across open stretches that we would normally have avoided in favour of a more protected route behind the scattered rocks and islands. We were treated to more Georgian Bay eye-candy as we paddled into one great photo-op after another.
We went for a ramble on Hincks Island, checking out potential tent spots and putting our Helinox chairs together so we could sit while we enjoyed a Gatorade and Clifbar break. It was 11 a.m. and we had reached the east end of Philip Edward Island. We could have stopped at Hincks and chilled for the day – it certainly was scenic enough. However, we would prove once again that at heart we are canoe trippers as opposed to canoe campers. We decided it was way too early to stop and figured that lunch at the top of Beaverstone Bay and then maybe a campsite near there would make more sense. So off we went, making easy progress.
By 12:30 we had paddled the eight-kilometers to the top of Beaverstone Bay and stopped for lunch. We watched a Coast Guard boat chug by and enter Collins Inlet while we sat in the shade and sipped on our Thai noodle soups and munched on our Wasa bread with peanut butter.
Then it was time to find a campsite. There was one indicated across from the used-to-be lumber mill community of Collins Inlet. We figured it would make for a good spot. I was also expecting to see a marina there and meet boaters passing through the Inlet; I even suggested that we could have a second lunch at the restaurant!
The state of the village dock in the image below was the first clue that my expectations were pure fantasy! The village of Collins Inlet died in 1917 when the lumber mill burned down; some of the pillars of the dock are amazingly still standing after 100 years of ice and thaw.
The Mill Lake Lodge sits directly cross from the remains of the dock. The Lodge consists of six cabins and the main building; it looks to be well-maintained and is definitely open for business. While we did not see anyone as we paddled by, that could be because the fishermen it caters to were all out for the day.
Across from the Mill Lake Lodge is Mahzenazing Lodge and the remains of the once-thriving community of Collins Inlet. When the mill burnt down the site was essentially abandoned until someone turned what was left into a fishing and hunting lodge. The 49-acre property is surrounded by the Grondine Indian Reserve on three sides and is billed as boat-access-only.
As we paddled towards the mouth of the Mahzenazing River and the entrance to the Mahzenazing property we noticed the billboard below, complete with a realty sign affixed to it. A bit of research after I got home turned up some info on the property – it is listed for sale at $749,000. by Narozanski North Realty Inc. From the unkept look of the site it is clear that it has not functioned as a lodge for a few years. Abandoned machinery sat there and at least a half-dozen “Private Property/No trespassing” signs told us we were not welcome but nobody seemed to be around to reinforce the message.
And that marina and restaurant – as if! Only in my imagination!
Leaving the Mahzenazing Lodge property, we paddled back out to the Inlet. Not having seen the campsite supposedly just east of the Mill Lake Lodge, we paddled west and continued our search. We had as our guide Jeff’s Killarney Map which indicated a few spots along the Inlet and down into Mill Lake. Our eventual conclusion after a few futile searches: what makes up a campsite may depend on whether you use a tent or a hammock and, if a tent, whether it is a one, two, or four-person one.
Over the next hour we paddled down Mill Lake as far as the south end of Green Island and checked out three different marked sites and a couple of unmarked ones that at first glance looked promising. Each time we refused to believe that was the best we could do. Finally, we admitted defeat and paddled back to the site directly across from the continuation of the Inlet on the west side of Mill Lake. We’d rate it a notch or two above “it’ll have to do”!
A bit of work and our four-person MEC Wanderer was up for the night. There was also room there for another tent – a two-person. Not shown in the pic below is the flat rock on the shore that made for a nice exposed eating area. That night – with no wind and no sound of the waves – would be the quietest of the three we spent!
Day Four: From Mill Lake to The Chikanishing River Take-Out Point
The home stretch – the 16 kilometers of Collins Inlet back to the Chikanishing parking lot. This “inside passage” from Beaverstone Bay all the way across the north side of Philip Edward Island was a favourite of the voyageurs of old, as it gave them a brief respite from the potentially turbulent waters of Georgian Bay.
We were actually a day early and in retrospect should perhaps have spent another day on the Georgian Bay side relaxing on Hincks Island.
Just beyond Ambush Narrows, said to be the site of an Ojibwe ambush of invading Iroquois warriors during the Algonquian/Iroquoian War of the mid-1600’s, we paddled up to the Collins Inlet pictograph site. On a twelve-meter (about 40′) stretch of the rock face pictured below are faded red ochre rock paintings left by Ojibwe shamans or vision quest-ers sometime in the last three or four hundred years.
They are not easy to see and, in fact, we did not see all of them on our visit. The reason – we only learned about their existence afterward. We would have looked a bit harder had we known!
To understand the site and its images, I turned to two sources. The first was Selwyn Dewdney and the 1962 first edition of his Indian Rock Paintings of the Great Lakes (Click on the title to access the text.) Dewdney visited the area in 1959. The book has a sketch of the site and a brief description of the some of the pictographs.
The other source was Discovering Rock Art: A Personal Journey With Tribal Elders, a study of a dozen Ontario Anishinaabe rock image sites by Thor Conway. It was published in the fall of 2016 – i.e. after our trip. Conway worked at the site on at least a couple of occasions in the 1980’s (1983 and 1989). I’ll use Conway’s organizational approach to examine the site more closely. He discusses the site in terms of four “panels” with each panel being a distinct collection of one or more rock paintings. Panel I is the furthest to the east and Panel IV is about twelve meters to the west.
As for Dewdney, of the more than 260 sites he would eventually visit, the Collins Inlet site was #39. He was there early in the summer in 1959, having been at Mazinaw Lake (#37, #38) in the days just before. He would go from Collins Inlet up to Temagami to see the Diamond Lake site (#40) afterwards.
Here is Dewdney’s description of the site. He approached it from the west so the first panel he describes – one solitary image – is Panel IV in Conway’s analysis.
The Collins Bay site is in the conventional red again, on the rock-lined inner passage that the voyageurs used when Georgian Bay got too rough for comfort. Here is an animal head as bodiless as that on the Quetico Lake site. Here again is our ubiquitous—though somewhat battered thunderbird, and tally marks, I should judge, rather than the alternative canoe.
He includes the following sketch in his book (See pp. 92-93 for the sketch and text.)
And that is it for his treatment of the site. Missing from his sketch is what Conway identified as Panel I; also missing is any discussion of the other images in the vertical collection of Panel II.
On our visit to the site, the image below captures all of what we were able to see. We saw Panel II with its four levels of pictographs, one on top of the other. About three feet to the left of this vertical panel is what Conway labels as Panel III, a lone thunderbird image, barely discernible.
Panel I is not in the image, but to the right and down closer to the waterline. Conway’s sketch of the image is accompanied by a quote from Joe Wabegijig of Manitoulin Island, who first saw the pictographs in 1901 when he was twelve. We learn of the Panel I image that “…there was a head with horns also marked in red.” Conway notes that it is possibly a large head or mask but does concede that it may be something else entirely.
This is the largest of the site’s panels. Dewdney comments only on the bottom image. I count twelve lines in his sketch. As he mentions, an alternative explanation is of a canoe with riders, indicated by the vertical lines. I’d go with the canoe. A calcite vein interrupts the canoe but you can see the continuation on the bottom right of the image below with four more riders indicated.
This canoe image is a common one in the Canadian Shield pictograph country and is often interpreted as a war canoe with a number of warriors and as a symbol of strength and power. This could be why it appears so close to Ambush Narrows, given its association with a bloody Anishinaabe encounter with Iroquois raiders from the south. Conway labels it as a canoe in his discussion of the panel.
Above the canoe is an image which most will assume is that of the Christian cross. If it is indeed a cross then the question arises – is it really the Christian cross? Some have argued that it is an ancient symbol used by the Medewiwin, the exclusive society of Objibe “medicine men” to indicate the fourth degree of attainment. Others argue that the Medewiwin itself was a post-contact nativist response to the incoming Europeans and that it repurposed the Christian cross, a obvious power symbol to the Europeans, and gave it a Ojibwe-related meaning. See here for further discussion of this contentious issue!
Of the Christian interpretation Thor Conway concludes –
This is unlikely. When you look for identical images at other Ojibwa rock art sites, you will find almost every example is painted above or below an animal image. This remains an intriguing and, as yet unexplained clue.
In looking at it I thought that it looked like a stylized and simple representation of a bird, an eagle (a totem symbol) perhaps or even Animikii, the Thunderbird. As opposed to a simple “plus sign”, the image bulges in the vertical middle and the top of the vertical line seems to have a beak point to the right. So…star – plus sign – Christian cross – bird? Who can say! Dewdney does not comment on this image or the ones above it in this panel.
Above the Animikii or cross image is what appears to be the rather rectangular and headless body of an animal. At the rear is an upright tail . Conway identifies it as a dog. I thought it could be a crude representation of Mishipeshu, the underwater lynx. To the left of the raised tail of the animal is a remnant of what could be a canoe image.
The zig zag lines at the very top of this small panel – well, again, who can say. In Dewdney’s sketch they appear as indistinct smudges. Of the jumble of lines Conway makes the following – a possible “shorebird track” and a canoe with paddler image. Bird footprints also appear at the Diamond Lake site. They may be statements of clan affiliation. What also appears at the Temagami-area site is the horned snake image. Perhaps the zig zag lines depicts a more horizontal version of the two-horned snake (Mishiginebig in Ojibwe) often depicted along with Mishipeshu. Its head and horns would be at the right side – i.e. the part of the rock painting that Dewdney did capture. It is the horned snake image at Diamond Lake in Temagami that I thought of as I tried to make sense of the zig zag lines here.
N.B. The analysis I provided above is likely off the mark! (Editor: Likely! Try 100%. While Animikii, Mishipeshu, and Mishiginebig are indeed figures from Ojibwe myth and were common subjects to be painted, the human mind has a knack for finding , even imposing, meaning and connection even on events and markings that have nothing to do with what the viewer wills them to be!
To the left of the vertical panel is a lone painting seen in the image below described by Dewdney as “our ubiquitous—though somewhat battered thunderbird“. Looking at Dewdney’s sketch of the image, he was not able to capture much of it the day he was there. Perhaps the angle of the sun? Animikii’s body is a triangle shape; the beak on top faces to he right.
A pictograph we did not see at all was the one Dewdney described as ” an animal head as bodiless as that on the Quetico Lake site“. I looked through his sketches and found this one from the mentioned Quetico Lake site; it was of the head and antlers of a woodland caribou.
Woodland caribou in Killarney? Conway includes interviews with a number of Ojibwe elders who have stories going back to the mid-1800’s when the caribou was in fact a part of the ecosystem of the area. A reader of this post was kind enough to send me a photo of the Panel IV caribou head.
He also sent a version of the image that had been processed using a pictograph enhancing application called DStretch. Seeing what it does makes me realize that I need to get a copy of the app too! What is really necessary are DStretch-ed versions of all the panels!
The antlers are not as dramatic as those on the Quetico Lake caribou head but other aspects of the representation correspond. Conway’s book also includes photos of the rice paper drawings he made on site of the caribou head – and of an almost vertical ocher slash located above the caribou head. The bottom of this slash may appear in the image below.
And that is it for the Collins Inlet Pictograph Site. Here is an overview shot I took of the rock face with the various markings indicated. Missing from it are Panel I (somewhere to the bottom right) and Panel IV. ( It is just to the left on the image I framed.) Already knowing that they are there will hopefully make it that much more likely that you will see them!
As indicated above, there is some minor evidence of graffiti a few feet to the left of (or west of) the Panel III Thunderbird image. You can see the initials J.P. in the middle. Just above them is the year number 1939 and more initials.
Update: After looking over the photos I took at the site and taking into account information gleaned and received since our visit, I can now identify the four panels that Conway uses to discuss the site. I’ve left in some of the tree growth in the rock face on either end to help as initial markers as you hone in on the various panels.
These pictographs face south and are quite exposed. Given all the human activity in the Inlet since they were painted here with the mixture of ground hematite and fish oil some three to four hundred years ago or so, it is nice to see that their presence has been respected by almost all non-Anishinaabe passerby going all the way back to Samuel de Champlain in 1615 (unless his trip down the Inlet pre-dated their painting).
Conway does record a brief statement by one elder from Manitoulin Island about a supposed attempt by Jesuit priests living in the Wikwemikong community – when is not stated – to erase one of the images –
And the priest kind of doubted that this thing could be washed off. They [the priests] tried to scrub it, and done everything else try to get it off. Never took anything off of it. It’s still there. (155)
In the end we just appreciate the fact that we can sit in our canoe in the same spot that an Ojibwe shaman sat or stood in as he dipped his fingers in the powdered hematite/fish oil mixture and reached out to the rock face intent on drawing specific images taken from his culture’s mythological image bank.
In his pictograph quest that day in 1959 Dewdney continued on down the inlet and back out to Georgian Bay and Point Grondine. He writes –
Farther east, I had no success in finding “an astonishing serpent” referred to in Harmon’s Journal, presumed to be in the vicinity of Grondines Point. In ’59 I flew over the area, a complex labyrinth of small islands and shoals, all seeming to shelve gently into the water.
It may be that Dewdney was looking in the wrong place. Daniel Harmon’s journal entries for May 26 to May 29, 1800 indicate that he was on the north shore of Lake Huron on May 26 near the Serpent River mouth.
Scratched into the lichen on a rock face near the mouth of the Serpent River was that “astonishing serpent” that Dewdney was looking for. See here for a brief article by Thor Conway in the March/April 1985 newsletter (Arch Notes )of the Ontario Archaeological Society.
There is, however, another reference to a pictograph site in the Point Grondine area that Dewdney may have had in mind. In 1850 J.J. Bigsby, an English physician and geologist, published a two-volume account of his travels in Canada in the 1820’s titled Shoe And Canoe. Of his route up Lake Huron he noted the following –
A pictograph site in the immediate vicinity of Point Grondine has yet to be found. If 22 kilometers qualifies as “not far hence” then perhaps Bigsby was relaying an account he had heard about the Collins Inlet site. It is clear from the text that their route did not in fact take them through the inlet; he mentions the Fox Islands as their next landmark.
As for us, we were headed west! As we paddled down the Inlet away from the pictographs our thoughts turned to something more mundane – fish and chips at the “World Famous” stand/restaurant in Killarney! Now we were motivated to finish off our canoe trip and drive into town, a few kilometers from the Chikanishing Road parking lot.
Blue skies and almost-ripple free water provided ideal paddling conditions. We did note a good campsite or two on our left (the P.E.I. side) as we got closer to the mouth of the Chikanishing River.
As we approached, a party of five or six canoes were heading out in the Bay; we caught the first two as they waited for the others. It was a Thursday; they would have more fabulous weather right through the weekend as they did their island hopping among the Foxes and the Hawks.
It was my first visit to the fish and chips place. My brother’s memory of the place went back to the 1980’s when it was simply a stand and not the elaborate building you see below.
Immediately across the street from the restaurant is an empty corner lot. Just as we pulled into the parking lot the rhythmic beats of the powwow drums started. Gathered there were members of the Wikwemikong First Nation of Manitoulin Island and their guests for a festival. (The Grondine Reserve north of Philip Edward Island is part of the greater Wikwemikong First Nation community.)
Speeches by Members of Parliament and elders were followed by a circle dance, some of which I captured on video below.
Taking in the speeches and watching the dancing provided a great ending to our fantastic four-day paddle. The wind and waves we had spent the days leading up to the trip worrying about proved to be fairly benign and we got to experience a beautiful little slice of our province.
Six hours after leaving Killarney we were on the shores of Lake Ontario – beautiful in itself and in its own way – but also a world away from the beauty of Killarney and the isolated north shore of Georgian Bay.
If You Want To Do this Canoe or Kayak Trip:
The most useful bit of writing on Philip Edward Island and the loop around the island is Chapter 4 in Kas Stone’s Paddling and Hiking The Georgian Bay Coast. An excellent overview map and a list of some twenty major sites to visit as well as a detailed natural and cultural history which puts everything into context makes it an essential read before you go. I have a copy on my bookshelf. We brought a photocopy along for the ride.
Kevin Callan has a chapter on Philip Edward island loop in a couple of his books. I found it in his Top Fifty Canoe Routes of Ontario. It is also in A Paddler’s Guide to Killarney and the French River. It has less detailed info than the Stone chapter but does provide the usual Callan drama and humour to entertain the reader. It’s worth checking out to see what he emphasizes in his account.
If you want a bit more history then a recent Callan book – Dazed But Not Confused: Tales of a Wilderness Wanderer has brief chapter on P.E.I. and Collins Inlet. You can read it (pages 99-102) on-line here at the Google Books website.
Killarney Outfitters has a useful webpage that will probably answer any question you might have about the logistics of a canoe or kayak trip in the waters of northern Georgian Bay. See here for their trip planning advice.
Your best single map for this trip is Jeff’s Killarney & The Georgian Bay Coast map. A waterproof plastic version of the map can be found at a MEC outlet or at the George Lake Park Shop where you also pay for your parking permit. Or – you can download a copy and print out the bit that you need yourself. See here for the various file download options – jpg, kmz (Google Earth), Garmin GPS, and iPhone and Android options.
Another good map is the ChrisMar map Philip Edward Island & Area, also waterproof. However, it does not give any campsite info or pictograph locations. It was finding this map at the downtown T.O. MEC store that set the ball in motion for this trip.
We also brought along our Garmin GPS devices. Given the maze of islands that you’re paddling through a gps device with the Topo Canada maps (version 4.0) is definitely useful. If you don’t have a dedicated gps device, your iPhone will probably do just fine. David Crawshay’s IOS app Topo Maps Canada is free and does a terrific job. See here for the iTunes page. Android users have the Gaia app. It costs $20. but gets excellent reviews from most who use it. See here for some info. There is also a IOS version of Gaia. there may be additional features that make it worth $20. more than Crawshay’s app. If you are familiar with it, feel free to add a comment below explaining why it’s worth the money – or not!
They were not really necessary but we also printed off the bits of a couple of topo 1:50,000 Federal Government topographic maps. You can access them at jeffstopos.com Look for Collins Inlet– 041H14 – and Lake Panache – 041I03.
If you have Google Earth installed on your computer here is the 2.8 mb kml file of our trip.
Mad About The Bay, a book of perhaps thirty photographs by William Harris and text by Elizabeth MacCallum and John Fraser, was published in 2004. I found it in the public library two years later and it prompted a one-week canoe trip in Massassagua Provincial Park that very summer. Using the latest technology, Harris provided a modern take on the Group of Seven’s vision from the 1920’s and 30’s. I wanted to capture some of the feel of Harris’ digitally-enhanced Georgian Bay images. While I wasn’t successful, on the plus side I was now aware of the Georgian Bay coast as a fantastic paddling destination and as a great place to frame beguiling images in my viewfinder!
Our Massassagua Park visit was done in August with way too many people around. We had to pre-book specific camp sites for each night. We just don’t canoe trip like that! Also, we got to paddle in a thick ugly smog that had blown all the way up from the Ohio Valley via southern Ontario. No escape that summer! Our week in Massassagua would prove to be perhaps our most forgettable canoe trip! I will admit that the greater isolation of the Killarney area, the better weather we had this year, and the fact that we were there just before the summer holiday season and were able to choose our campsites each day made for a much better trip.
A copy of Conway’s Discovering Rock Art can be had from the author himself. See here for the web page. It can also be found at Amazon. It provides essential cultural context for not just the Collins Inlet pictograph site but for a dozen in all, ranging from the Peterborough petroglyphs in eastern Ontario to the Artery Lake site on the Ontario-Manitoba border in Woodlands Caribou Provincial Park.
The Future Status of Philip Edward Island:
Currently P.E.I. and the other small island archipelagos south of Collins Inlet and Beaverstone Bay are Crown Land and open to all. The map below shows the southern boundary of Killarney Park and of the Point Grondine Reserve (since 1968 a part of the Wikwemikong First Nation which is located on the east side of Manitoulin Island). Free camping is not allowed on Point Grondine land; however, in August of 2015 Point Grondine Park opened with day and overnight hiking trails developed with the help of Killarney staff. There are two designated campsites in the Killarney P. P. stretch of Collins Inlet. You can camp for free on the other side of the inlet on P.E.I.!
A Toronto Star article from September 10, 2015 provides some basic information about the planned change in land ownership: Access To Pristine Land At Stake In First Nations Deal.
A post last August in the Canadian Canoe Routes forum alerted readers to the potential change in the status of Philip Edward Island. Depending how things unfold, it may become a part of the Wikwemikong First Nation and what that would mean to its accessibility to the paddling community is unclear. Click on the blue link below to read some informed and passionate responses from fellow paddlers to the land claims issue – Important Message about Philip Edward Island & areaL